Yes, Facebook addicts, must get out to socialize more!

 

Facebook addicts should get out and socialise more

The Star/Asia News Network

WITH every new level of technology comes a corresponding wave of casualties.

From theft victims careless with their bank ATM cards to gullible folk cheated in online scams, the story is familiar enough.

So today we see the rise of Facebook addicts. The fact that this involves victims without criminal perpetrators does not make it any less serious.

Facebook addiction has been known to affect the psychological and physical health of its victims.

It also affects the personal relationships that victims had, or might have had, with others around them.

It is therefore a personal, domestic and social problem. The affliction is universally acknowledged by health professionals who have dubbed it Facebook Addiction Disorder (FAD).

It is compulsive, invasive of one's personal life, distorts priorities, damages one's capacity to relate to others around them and disorientates one to reality.

There are withdrawal symptoms, pangs of “cold turkey” and it is all downright senseless and wasteful.
How can it then be addressed effectively?

Relying on addicts to stop their addiction is not going to work. Neither will legislation, since Facebook can all too easily be accessed through computers or smartphones.

With children and young adults, FAD is particularly pernicious because it eats away at their health in their formative years.

Yet, it is with young addicts that the problem is perhaps easier to avoid with prudent parental intervention.

Adults as parents or guardians therefore have a responsibility to ensure that those under their care do not fall victim to FAD. And as adults anyway, with or without others under their care, they need to set an example by not falling victim themselves.

If push comes to shove, there is always the off switch.

For Malaysians to “have the most Facebook friends in the world” may at first sound gratifying, but in reality it is a condition ridden with problems and liabilities.

The best friends tend to be those you encounter in the flesh. A “friend” in cyberspace may be very unreal, whether as a notional friend of a friend, a fictional character, or even a predator.

If Malaysians have the most virtual friends in the world, it may well be that we have the least real friends in the world. And that would be another tragedy in itself.



Hi, I was a Facebook addict

I REFER to “Hooked on FB”  (Jan 20), on Facebook Addicton Disorder (FAD), and agree with Dr Nivashinie Mohan’s statement that people with this disorder “continue to go undetected because most addicts do not realise or admit they have a problem”.

If there had been a circle of addicts on the floor at the FAD forum, I would have introduced myself and said: “Hello everyone, I was a Facebook addict”.

When I decided to navigate to the “deactivate account” button last December, I thought I was making the hardest decision I would ever make, having been a Facebook member since 2006.

I did not have hundreds and thousands of friends (most of whom we ignore anyway and just concentrate on the five to ten so-called friends), but it was the excitement of waking up every morning literally dying to know what the rest of the world was up to.

I was an active lurker looking into my friends’ beautifully edited photos of where they went on holiday, what they cooked for their children last night, friends updating their status every five minutes (as if having a huge following on Twitter wasn’t enough) somebody’s wedding, graduation and etc.

After a while, I felt funny. Why is this so important? Why can’t we call, visit or text each other instead? Wouldn’t this be more intimate, more humanly possible to touch base sans the social network?

Aren’t we concerned about the security of our information over the Internet? A paedophile would have a field day ogling at our children’s profiles and the repercussions would be devastating.

And aren’t political and racial updates overly nauseating?

Don’t make me start with friends who actually upload positive thoughts by the dozen until you actually think they are really closet pessimists who crave attention (yes, that is yet another disorder).

Then again, self realisation is the best way to overcome any disorder, and admitting it is the next step to get oneself out of the problem. Who knows, maybe FAD sufferers may get help from support groups or toll free numbers in future.

To each his own, as the old saying goes.

For the majority, it is necessary to maintain one’s Facebook account as it is a vital part of one’s life and we are, as long as we are the ones in control.

For the minority, like me, we choose not to be the norm and will find other alternative communicating routes to get our messages across.

SUZLENE ZAKARIAH,
Seri Kembangan.

Have clear policy on FB for workers 

Bosses must devise solutions to deal with this IT challenge!

I WOULD like to share my opinion in relation to “Bosses face problem with workers wasting time on FB” (The Star, Jan 20). The use of social networking websites and its easy accessibility has posed a lot more challenges and problems to the employer than has been pointed out.

Social network, depending on the nature of the work, can be good or bad for productivity. For some it’s one of the most cost and time effective way to promote and achieve sales targets.

Some government agencies and NGOs use it in their work to reach more people and to better know their stakeholders.

For those who work long hours or are on the graveyard shift and are detached from family and friends, it may help reduce stress.

Social networking can be a recruitment tool. Some employers and recruitment agents use it to do background checks on employees.

On the converse, it can severely affect productivity as employees waste countless hours on social networking. When done in the office, it increases unwarranted Internet traffic and slows down office network speed.

A major issue which has got a lot of attention globally is employees making statements about their employers that are considered negative by the employer.

While statements which tend to lower the reputation of the employer in public can be considered libel, it is more complicated when it comes to employment relationships. There are two schools of thought.

In the UK, the employment tribunal upheld a decision by Apple to sack an employee for posting on Facebook his displeasure about his iPhone and various aspects of his company even though his remarks only reached certain people due to the privacy settings.

In the US, the National Labour Relations Board (NLRB) came to an opposite conclusion and found illegal a company’s decision to fire an employee based on disparaging remarks about her employer and on a work place incident she sent from her home computer 
.
I feel the UK approach is better. A negative statement by an employee can severely affect the employer. The company’s reputation is at stake, and it may affect the employer’s business goodwill and profits. Some job seekers might shun the company purely based on hearsay.

And, in a more sinister way, social networking can be used to disrupt industrial harmony by organising illegal strikes to cripple an entire industry and bring down the economy.

I don’t feel that a strict policy on social networking may discourage young ones from joining a particular company.

The main concern for the working young, or everyone for that matter, is the pay and benefits, and of course job satisfaction.

An employee frequently using social network at work should face disciplinary action to serve as a reminder to the perpetrator and to show others how serious the employer views such complacency.

And of course for the company to take disciplinary action it has to have rules to begin with. As long as there are no sanctions, employees will continually flout company rules and slack.

But again some might argue that it may not always be practical in real life as the world and society are addicted to social networking.

Some young employees, fresh to the working world, have no clue on responsible working etiquette and may think that employers don’t mind them engaging in social networking during work hours.

It is important that a clear policy is drawn up by the employers and brought to the attention of employees on how the company feels about it and how it affects them.

The responsibility of discipline at work does not start with the HR/IR practitioners. Our education system should have an active role in educating and shaping young ones who will be joining the work force one day.

Not only institutes of higher education like colleges and universities but schools as well should inculcate responsible work etiquette which includes being on the social network during work hours, among other things. Sadly, this is lacking.

While it is almost impossible to prevent employees from accessing social network sites, as it can be easily accessed through their smart phones, both employers and capable HR/IR practitioners have to come up with proper solutions to deal with whatever challenges advancement of technology throws at them.

JOHN MARK,Segamat.

Related post: 
You addicted to Facebook ?

The natural evolution of markets

THINK ASIAN By ANDREW SHANG 

 

Market change: A general view of ebay headquarters in San Jose, California. Websites like ebay and Alibaba has eliminated geographical space by allowing transactions in rural markets to be done online. —Reuters

Man is a social animal. The 19th century sociologist and philosopher Georg Simmel argued that trade and exchange is “one of the purest and most primitive forms of human socialisation.” Last month, while travelling through remote parts of West Timor, in Indonesia, I was able to study first-hand how rural markets operate. I could not help wondering why so-called primitive markets such as these work so well when complex financial markets can be so dysfunctional?

Rural markets in East Timor are wonders of trade. Men and women in tribal costume converge on different villages on different days of the week. Everyone knows when to go to which village for these markets, which typically start at dawn when produce is fresh and often finish by 11am. Economists would surely call this scene of bustling rural commerce a “concentration of liquidity.”

As the late Stanford economist John McMillan argued, the market is a human construction- a tool. The market has features to make it work smoothly: mechanisms to organise buying and selling; channels for information flow; laws that define property rights, and self-regulating rules that govern behaviour.

Most rural markets are much more complex than they appear. They sell everything needed for daily life and have their own hierarchies. The stalls of wealthier, established traders are sheltered and in the best locations, while poorer traders just spread their wares on the ground. Specialisation is evident even in this basic setting there are designated places to buy textiles, fresh meat or fish, vegetables or household goods. These markets also function efficiently as information exchanges. Prices differ depending on who you are and what you know. Tourists pay more because they do not know the local language or rules, while locals bargain vigorously.

In these basic markets, you can observe the entire range of business evolution, from simple production, to wholesaling to final sale. Everything is designed for convenience and to reduce transaction costs. For instance, there are no roadside petrol pumps. Instead, petrol is sold in small bottles because the most common transport are motorbike taxis that carry as many as three passengers plus the occasional chicken or bag of rice.

The permeation of technologies like mobile phones and the internet even into these remote rural areas has accelerated the speed at which information travels through these markets. This means even lower transaction costs between business, between consumers, and from businesses to consumers. In some instances, use of websites like eBay and Alibaba have eliminated geographical space by allowing transactions in such markets to be done online.

With technology ending the isolation of rural markets and linking them to global markets, the production and marketing game is changing beyond recognition. A similar phenomenon occurred in the airline industry. Budget airlines use the internet to sell forward excess capacity at below average cost, thus filling their planes to capacity and maximising profits. This created a new market because before, many people could not afford to fly.

You see the effect of high transportation costs clearly in rural markets. Here, locally produced goods are ludicrously cheap, but imported good are very expensive.

The study of modern, sophisticated supply chains enables us to appreciate the fact that producers do not necessarily make most of their money in the product-to-consumer chain. The rule of thumb is that if a product costs US$1 to make, the distribution and transportation costs may account for US$3 of the US$4 final sale price to the consumer. Common conceptions of innovation still focus largely on creating new products, whereas services or process innovation are probably much more profitable and add more value than is generally understood.

To illustrate, the global trade regime still has a “hardware” focus, concentrating on physical trade rather than the more complex and less measured services trade. Apple innovated not in manufacturing, but in design and lifestyle. This means that it can sell a product at much higher prices than its competitors. Once it has captured a market, value creation comes from downloading new apps for the iPhone and iPad.

Financial services have emerged as one of the most profitable businesses, certainly until the last financial crisis. For a time before the 2007 crisis, the turn on capital in the financial sector was 20% per annum, significantly higher than for manufacturing and other real sector businesses.

With the benefit of hindsight, we now know there were two major reasons for the large profits in finance. The first is that the physical cost of creation of a financial derivative is almost zero, as it is an abstract product of its creator's imagination. For many, the reason to buy a derivative is to hedge and reduce risk. If a buyer believes that the hedge is useful, which it can be under specific circumstances then he or she will be willing to pay a premium for that hedge. A second reason is leverage. The greater the leverage, the larger the profits are for both lender and borrower. But there is a catch it adds systemic risk to the entire market and can be fatal to the over-leveraged borrower.

The FX Accummulator is a good example. It is a financial product that looks and feels like a wonderful foreign exchange hedge that yields good profits for the speculator. However, many were not aware that at certain price levels, the amount of margin called by the lender could be greater than the total assets held by the speculator. Thus, what appears to be a “safe” hedge can turn out to be toxic, particularly when markets are volatile.

This raises the question whether financial markets have evolved beyond the limits of social safety. University of Southampton Professor Richard Werner is one of the first to point out that there are two aspects of credit creation one that contributes to real value creation and one that does not. Financial markets have evolved into highly complex systems that consumers, financial experts or regulators do not fully understand. Increasingly, they contribute less to social utility and become systemically fragile.

As McMillan presciently pointed out, “markets are not miraculous. There are problems they cannot address. Left to themselves, markets can fail. Viewed as tools, markets need be neither revered nor reviled just allowed to operate where they are useful.”

Rural markets arise from communities that have organised their commerce in such a way that reinforces social utility and stability. The Holy Grail of financial theory and practice in the world's advanced economies is to identify at what level of complexity financial markets exceed the limits of social stability.

Andrew Sheng is President of Fung Global Institute.

Auditing in hard times

OPTIMISTICALLY CAUTIOUS By ERROL OH

HOW bad will things be this year? Everybody has some thoughts on that, but nobody really knows, of course. But if you're thinking of turning to the accountants and auditors for some reassurance and optimism amid the gloom, you're definitely barking up the wrong tree.

The fact is, this fraternity is already bracing for the worst and is calling upon members to be on the lookout for signs of trouble as they carry out their work.

On Dec 28, the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), the New York-based independent standard-setting body, issued a press release to draw attention to the challenges that accounts preparers and auditors currently face.

“The global economy continues to experience difficult conditions as the effects of the financial crisis for example, on corporate cash flows and access to credit persist. Volatility in capital markets, and issues including measurement and disclosure of exposures to sovereign debt of distressed countries, continue to create uncertainty,” says the board.

“The impact of these issues and uncertainty has wide-ranging financial reporting implications that often extend beyond national borders.”

The IAASB points out that such conditions make it challenging for management of entities, those charged with governance, and auditors to do their jobs.

According to the board, among the tough aspects of this groups' responsibilities are assessing an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and making relevant disclosures in the financial statements and auditor's report.



(In accounting, the going-concern concept assumes that an entity will continue operating indefinitely. Therefore, its accounts are prepared accordingly and there's no need to reflect the possibility that the entity will soon grind to a halt and its assets sold off.)

The board reminds auditors of the requirements of the International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). It adds that in every assignment, an auditor must weigh whether it's appropriate for the management to use the going-concern assumption.

Said IAASB chairman Professor Arnold Schilder: “Difficult economic conditions give rise to many important audit considerations, but none more important or more difficult than evaluating management's assessment of an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and determining the appropriate auditor reporting in the circumstances.”

What's interesting is that the board has asked auditors to refer to a three-year-old document titled Audit Considerations in Respect of Going Concern in the Current Economic Environment.\

“While this Audit Practice Alert was released in context of the 2008-2009 credit crisis, many of the matters addressed in it are equally relevant today,” said Schilder.

“For example, an entity may be experiencing a decline in its financial health, or may have material uncertainties arising from direct or indirect exposures to sovereign debt of distressed countries. Auditors are therefore encouraged to review the Alert and, importantly, the relevant requirements in the ISAs.”

On Wednesday, the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (MIA) came out with a circular that's largely based on the IAASB press release.

Says MIA executive director Ho Foong Moi in the circular: “Auditors in Malaysia similarly should take cognisance of the currently-challenging global economy and accordingly must remain alert throughout the audit to identify and critically examine evidence of events or conditions that may exist nationally or globally which may cast significant doubt on an entity's ability to continue as a going concern.

“Auditors must continue to exercise professional scepticism and judgment in evaluating financial-statement disclosures and the implications for the auditor's report when a material-uncertainty exists relating to events or conditions that, individually or collectively, may cast significant doubt on the entity's ability to continue as a going concern.”

So, the message is clear these days, auditors have to be more questioning about the standard-management assumption that a business is in a position to go on and on. After all, which management will readily admit that the entity is reaching the end of the road?

The truth is, many businesses fail, even in the best of times. And when the economies and industries go through rough patches, it's harder to hide flaws in business models and weaknesses in how businesses are run. And when this happens, many people depend on the accountants and auditors to raise the red flags.

Therefore, the huge economic uncertainties we're experiencing now are as much a test of the profession's alertness and integrity as they are a test of the businesses' strength and resilience.

Executive editor Errol Oh didn't like tests when he was in school and that hasn't changed. But now he at least recognises that testing serves a purpose.

Here is the Dragon, the best to come?

The Dragon is here and the best is yet to come

BRICKS AND MORTAR By TEH LIP KIM

COME midnight tomorrow, as we usher in the Year of the Dragon, most of us will not help but stop to wonder what the next 12 “moons” of the lunar calendar have in store for us.



The Dragon the fifth and incidentally the only mythical animal of the 12 animal signs in the Chinese zodiac is a symbol of power and good fortune.

Those born under this sign are considered to be dynamic, flamboyant, colourful and vibrant. People born under the sign of the Dragon include historical figures Joan of Arc and Martin Luther King Jr, author Pearl S. Buck and artiste John Lennon.

This year is the year of the Water Dragon and astrologers believe will be a year of many opportunities for growth and expansion.

But astrology aside, what exactly can we expect in the year ahead for the property sector? If one is to listen to the rumblings on the ground, it sounds like it's a mixed bag up ahead.

Built quality: A worker inspects a dragon lantern decoration made from recycled materials and energy-saving LED lights at a temple in Jenjarom, Selangor. The Chinese year of the Dragon ushers mixed feelings about the property sector but with the right design concept like this environment-conscious dragon lantern, homebuyers will still make that commitment. -AFP

For many in the business from those who are building and selling or just analysing its investment climate there still is room for growth in the Malaysian property market, at least in the next few years.

Initiatives by the government, such as the proposed high-speed rail link from Kuala Lumpur to Johor Baru and the MRT project, are expected to give the property sector a boost.

Areas that currently are not nearly as easily accessible will soon be easily reached by rail or MRT, and this will certainly be a boost for the value of property in these areas.

Take a look at the route for the first phase of the MRT between Sungai Buluh and Kajang and you will see that major residential centres will soon be linked by rail to popular commercial and entertainment centres.

Of course the finer details such as where all the stations will eventually be located are still being worked out.



On the other hand, some players in the property market are painting a rather gloomier picture, citing conditions in Europe and the United States as reasons for caution. The European debt crisis does not seem any closer to resolution and, some analysts fear, export driven economies such as China, Brazil and Malaysia, are not likely to come off the turmoil unscathed.

Across the Atlantic, the US economy is, as some economists there put it, “still messed-up”. In Japan, hit by the mega earthquake and tsunami of 2011, the economy is still experiencing long-term problems that are considered even worse than that in the United States.

Back home, some players in the property market are expecting a more moderate growth in 2012. In some areas, there may even be a price correction, going by what these people are saying.

According to them, commercial properties as well as high-end residential units are likely to be most susceptible to a market downturn. These are the first to be hit when confidence in the market ebbs.

Nevertheless, there is a bright spot of sorts in the midst of this gloomy outlook. A bubble is unlikely in the Malaysian property market.

So what do we think? Do we see a boom or bust, or something in between? Predicting what will come is a game of chance. Who really knows what the future holds for us anyway?

On the other hand, we can always analyse our own experience in the preceding 12 months to find hope in the corresponding period ahead.

As we have seen, Malaysian property prices are still among the lowest in the Southeast Asian region. As I wrote in this column sometime last year, Kuala Lumpur is only the sixth most expensive city in this region to invest in property, behind Singapore, Phnom Penh, Bangkok, Jakarta and Manila.

That means there still is room for upward price movement. Of course other factors will come into play. As most property investors will tell you, location is a prime consideration.

Areas that are well served by public transportation facilities will certainly be preferred over those that are not and, logically, will command higher demand and thus fetch higher prices.

Entry price is, of course, another factor. Take a look around you and you will see that many new launches, even in the Klang Valley, have remained unsold. These mostly luxury homes have unfortunately been priced way above most investors' affordability.

At RM3mil to RM4mil a unit, even for landed property, landing a buyer is a tall order.

Of course this does not mean that million-ringgit homes are no longer in demand. Our experience shows that anything priced between RM1mil and RM1.75mil, and in the right location can still find buyers.

At that price, such properties still meet the needs of those who purchase with the intention to occupy as well as those who hope to see their property appreciate in value. At the same time, the repayment amount is still within the means of a fair number of Malaysians, especially those in their 30s or 40s and who are already fairly established in their careers.

For instance if a couple were to purchase a home at RM1.75mil, they are likely to be able to get a loan of up to 80% of the cost of the property or about RM1.4mil.

At an interest rate of 4.35% (BLR-2.25%) for a repayment period of 20 years, their monthly repayment amounts to RM8,744 a sum that a fair number of working couples can afford.

The right designs and concepts also add to the value of such properties. Many property purchasers today do not have the time and some not even the inclination to fuss over how to spruce up an apartment before moving in.

To meet their needs, developers also provide many fixtures and appliances so one can move in with just clothes and perhaps a new bed.

Overall, I think there still is room for growth in the Malaysian property sector. There will certainly be many more new launches whatever the doomsayers say. At the right price, in the right location and with the right design concept, homebuyers will still make that commitment.

Our economy is expected to grow about 5% or more and unemployment is at a low 3%. The outlook remains positive, as reflected in the stock market.

So if you are still looking to invest in property, the Year of the Dragon may be as good as any year to make that commitment. Remember, it is supposed to be a year when there will be many opportunities for growth and expansion.

Teh Lip Kim is the MD of SDB Properties Sdn Bhd, a lifestyle property company. Bouquets and brickbats are welcomed. Send by email to md@sdb.com.my

Dragon year roars !

May this Water Dragon roar?

WHY NOT? By WONG SAI WAN

Much is pinned on 2012, and as we enter the Year of the Dragon, let it also turn out to be a watershed.



THE dragon is both feared and revered not only by the Chinese but also by almost every ancient civilisation. Fables tell of the wisdom and beauty, as well as the evil and tyranny, of the majestic mythical beast.

The Europeans – whether the Anglo-Saxons of middle Europe or the Vikings of the North – have their favourite tales of the dragon.

The English-educated among us will remember the fable of St George, who rescued a fair maiden from being sacrificed to a mean and ferocious fire-breathing beast.

The Vikings believed that the dragons fought with their gods, and very often won such battles. The ancient Scandinavians hero-worshipped these creatures, and even named and designed famed war boats after them.

The ancient Greeks and Egyptians shared the Vikings’ belief that the dragons fought constantly with the gods, and their battles were responsible for earthquakes, floods and all sorts of disasters that we blame today on nature.

 

Festive colours: Workers decorating a dragon-shaped sculpture in preparation for a dragon dance for the upcoming Chinese New Year in Wenzhou, Zhejiang province, China. — Reuters

Basically, in the ancient west, dragons were always portrayed as baddies, if not evil itself. Even these days, Hollywood movies would, more often than not, portray the mythical flying and fire-breathing beast as a destructive force.

However, in the east, the dragons were the good guys – often seen as divine beings or blessings from the gods. Regardless of the myth being of Chinese, Vietnamese, Japanese, Bhutanese or Korean origin (all these cultures share the same lunar calendar), the dragon is always a symbol of wisdom, wealth and power.



To the ancient Chinese, not all dragons are created equal because, historically, the winged serpent was the symbol of the Emperor of China. In the Zhou Dynasty, the five-clawed dragon symbolised the Son of Heaven (Emperor), the four-clawed the nobles and the three-clawed the ministers.

This changed in the later Qin Dynasty. The five-clawed dragon became exclusive to the Emperor. Everyone else was free to use the various other claw combinations.

{China hasn't issued a stamp with this ferocious a dragon since 1878 (Photo Xinhua)} >>

On Monday, January 23^rd-2012 the new moon in Aquarius heralds in the Chinese New Year. The year of the Water Dragon begins and the year of the Metal Rabbit ends.

Even in Malaysia, we have our own dragon legends, with the one supposedly in Tasik Chini being the most famous. The Chini Naga fought off the Sri Kemboja Naga, forcing it to flee north to where Cambodia is today.

Many people living in Tasik Chini still talk about the monster that lives in the lake which at one stage was drying up due to logging at its tributary rivers. However, the lake is now flourishing again and is a popular local tourist spot, especially for anglers.

The animal sign for this lunar year is the dragon whose element is water. The last Year of the Water Dragon was between Jan 27, 1952 and Feb 13, 1953.

Yes, just like 12 years ago when the dragon last visited us, there will be a rush “to make dragon babies” because people born under this sign are deemed to be very lucky in life.

Among famous dragon personalities are actors Christopher Reeves, Patrick Swayze, David Hasselhoff and Liam Neeson, and author Amy Tan.

In Malaysia, among those born 60 years ago – and thus also water dragons – are PKR president Datin Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, tycoon and Berjaya boss Tan Sri Vincent Tan, and Finance Minister II Datuk Seri Ahmad Husni Mohamad Hanadzlah.

A water dragon may sound harmless enough but that depends on which astrologer, feng shui master or seer one speaks to.

Some see it as the most thinking of all dragons because the person born under this sign is serene, calm and unhurried – just like water. He or she is also very persuasive and can wear down anyone with charm and diplomacy.

However, other readers of the stars call the water dragon the tsunami dragon because water is the only element that can destroy the other four elements – wood, fire, metal and earth.

They expect those born this year to be able to sweep away all those standing in their way, just like a tsunami.

Personally, I hope that the 2012 dragon will bring about definite decisions to the many questions that have been thrown up in the past few years.

For one thing, I hope that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak will call a general election soon and that Malaysians respond by making a firm decision on what they want.

Another thing that needs thorough cleaning is the world’s economy. There has been so much uncertainty in the world’s economy because there doesn’t seem to be an end to financial crashes – first in the United States, then in Europe.

Ratings by rating houses are supposed to indicate for sure what the value of various financial instruments is. Instead, these rating houses’ downgrading of various European Union states’ credit ratings as well as the rescue package has only caused further uncertainty.

Rating houses, just like hedge funds, need to be fried by the dragon.

Hopefully, the Dragon Year will bring about a total collapse of the world’s economic system so that we can replace it with one that actually works. It’s time to wipe the slate clean.

It is time for the water dragon to roar and show its colours.

Executive editor Wong Sai Wan wishes everyone Gong Xi Fa Cai, and may the dragon year be a blessed one.

Related articles

• Energy Trends Forecast for 2012 - Year of the Water Dragon (fullbloomfengshui.wordpress.com)
• Tin Yat Water Dragon Panga Machete - Gift for you! (2012!) (makchingyuen.wordpress.com)
• GONG XI FA CAI - Happy Chinese New Years - Year of The Dragon 2012 (tougeg.wordpress.com)
• What does the Year of the Yang Water Dragon entail? (lediarunnels27221219.wordpress.com)
• Chinese New Year 2012 Year of The Dragon (socyberty.com)
• Year of the Water Dragon -Chinese New Year- January 23, 2012 (anythingastro.com)