Pages

Showing posts with label jmb. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jmb. Show all posts

Friday, June 21, 2024

Commissioner Of Buildings (COB) In Malaysia, And Their 6 Main Functions


Have you heard of the Commissioner of Buildings (COB)? Maybe it’s whispered about in your apartment complex at night — "be sure to pay your maintenance fees, or the Commissioner of Buildings will get you".
Don’t worry, it’s not as scary as that! The COB is actually a valuable part of effective facility management, and that’s particularly important when you live in a large stratified property.
So, let’s dispel the myths and get down to the truth. Here’s everything you need to know about the Commissioner of Building in Malaysia, and why that’s important to you as a property owner.

Understanding The Commissioner Of Buildings

The Commissioner of Buildings is essentially an enforcement officer designed to police the rules and regulations of the Strata Management Act 2013 (SMA).
This Act is the framework of regulation, which ensures stratified properties are managed and maintained in an effective and fair manner.
Commissioner of buildings Malaysia, Commissioner of building Malaysia, Commissioner of Buildings, Commissioner of building, Commissioner of Buildings Selangor, Building management, Facility management, Property management
It’s the set of rules that lays out the rights and obligations of every single stratified property owner in Malaysia, as well as other relevant parties, such as management bodies and developers.
It includes essential elements of stratified property ownership, such as the rules and limits around maintenance fees and sinking funds.
A COB will only ever be appointed to oversee stratified properties such as apartments, condos, or flats, so you don’t have to worry about someone turning up at your bungalow looking to enforce any rules!
Stratified properties are those where owners possess a strata title to individual property units as part of a larger shared development, and some less common property types like townhouses.
In addition, the Commissioner of Buildings is empowered by a local council authority within a given state.
So, for example: the Commissioner of Buildings Selangor will have separate agents appointed by, and responsible for, municipal councils from Subang JayaPetaling JayaKajang, and so on.
You can find a handy list of Commissioner of Buildings compiled by the National House Buyers Association to refer to here.
The COB is empowered to investigate and adjudicate on breaches of the SMA, providing a neutral third-party that ensures all rules are fairly applied to everyone involved. Basically, they’re kind of like the sheriff of building management.

PropertyGuru Tip

The term ‘adjudicate’ simply refers to the process of determining how much stamp duty is payable for the instrument of transfer.

Commissioner of buildings Malaysia, Commissioner of building Malaysia, Commissioner of Buildings, Commissioner of building, Commissioner of Buildings Selangor, Building management, Facility management, Property management
A Commissioner of Buildings’ role isn’t just about punishing people though. It’s designed to ensure proper management and upkeep of stratified property is maintained for the benefit of all.
They’ve even got a cool description of their objective, taken from the official Klang Commissioner of Buildings’ website:
To ensure maintenance of joint property is implemented, based on the law and procedures, for creating harmony in life sharing joint property for the development of elevated [buildings].

What Does The Commissioner Of Buildings Do?

Like we’ve highlighted above, the Commissioner of Buildings enforces the rules laid out in the Strata Management Act 2013. But what does that really cover?

It’s not just maintenance fees and sinking funds like you might think. There are six main functions of the Department of Building Commissioner, as noted by the Klang COB:
  1. Conducting inventory on buildings within the relevant local area.
  2. Ensure the establishment of a Joint Management Body (JMB) for development involving stratified planning.
  3. Resolving any dispute between the developer and the purchaser relating to the establishment of the JMB and account maintenance.
  4. Monitor the action of a developer in addressing repair defects.
  5. Enforce the law stipulated in the Strata Management Act (Act 757) 2013 and the Strata Management Act 2013 (Act 757).
  6. Provide periodic learning about administrative management, audited accounts, financial provisions and other various topics related to the management of JMB/MC.
That list of duties covers a whole range of property management obligations, from accounts right through to education and support for the Joint Management Body (JMB) or Management Corporation (MC).
The Commissioner of Buildings is entitled to a range of powers in order to fulfill the obligations highlighted above.
They include, but are not limited to, access to accounts of management boards and developers for the purpose of auditing.
Commissioner of buildings Malaysia, Commissioner of building Malaysia, Commissioner of Buildings, Commissioner of building, Commissioner of Buildings Selangor, Building management, Facility management, Property management
That means all decisions made by the COB should be informed by the latest financial information to ensure appropriate oversight.
The COB can also step in and appoint an individual to assemble meetings in order to meet the obligations of building management, or order the MC itself to hold an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) if required.
Commissioner of Buildings, or authorised personnel designated by the COB, may access a property for the purpose of carrying out essential repairs at any time.
The COB also has power to prosecute any individuals who fail to meet their payment obligations such as management or maintenance fees, and adjudicate on any dispute around payment of such fees.
That includes obligations around the defect liability period that’s laid out in the Housing Development Act.

Is The COB Always Right?

It might sound like the COB is some sort of all-powerful overseer of strata property management, but that doesn’t mean they’re not also held accountable.
Commissioner of buildings Malaysia, Commissioner of building Malaysia, Commissioner of Buildings, Commissioner of building, Commissioner of Buildings Selangor, Building management, Facility management, Property management
The COB is answerable to the Strata Management Tribunal. On top of that, the rulings of the COB are ultimately answerable to legal processes in the courts, and challenges to COB decisions can be brought in via this way.
In one example from 2010, a Management Corporation (MC) for a development in Penang challenged the COB in the High Court over a ruling that only unit owners could be elected as council members of stratified property management corporations.
The COB ruling, and the following appeal, were later upheld. The COB isn’t always in the right, however.
In 2013, the COB ruled on a case whereby a developer owed a JMB for a shortfall of RM500,000 in overdue maintenance funds.
The JMB referred the matter to the COB, who ruled that the sum was owed by the developer to the JMB. A court ruling later dismissed this, citing lack of jurisdiction in this matter by the COB.

What’s The Difference Between COB And Strata Management Tribunal?

At this point, some of you might be wondering where the Strata Management Tribunal (SMT) comes into play?
The Strata Management Tribunal is another legally recognised body, which, like the Commissioner of Buildings, provides a vital service in overseeing stratified properties.
Commissioner of buildings Malaysia, Commissioner of building Malaysia, Commissioner of Buildings, Commissioner of building, Commissioner of Buildings Selangor, Building management, Facility management, Property management
While the COB is concerned with the general needs and enforcement of building maintenance and management, the SMT is a body which exclusively deals with resolving disputes. There are some subtle differences however, that should be recognised.
Ultimately, the COB is answerable to the SMT, since it’s the empowered legal authority for overseeing the implementation of the full Strata Management Act 2013The Strata Management Tribunal is limited to claims brought by the following parties:
  • Developer
  • Purchaser
  • Proprietor
  • Joint Management Body (JMB)
  • Management Corporation (MC)
  • Subsidiary Management Company (SMC)
  • Managing agent
  • Relevant parties (Special permission granted by Tribunal)
The SMT is designed to provide an affordable and accessible dispute resolution body for problems of stratified ownership. There’s no legal representation required, except in extremely complex cases where it’s deemed that one party may be disadvantaged by lack of representation.
The critical point to understand about the SMT in relation to the COB is that the SMT will only hear claims covering financial costs up to a maximum RM250,000.
Any cases over that amount, such as the 2013 disputed claim noted above, are outside that scope. You can find out more about the full details of the Strata Management Tribunal here.
Breaking down the difference between SMT and COB in the most simple way possible – the Commissioner of Buildings is the sheriff and the enforcer, the Strata Management Tribunal is the judge(s) who oversee application of the law.
These are all important measures to ensure all stratified properties don’t end up becoming like the Wild Wild West of property management!
Relevant Guides:
Disclaimer: The information is provided for general information only. PropertyGuru International (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd makes no representations or warranties in relation to the information, including but not limited to any representation or warranty as to the fitness for any particular purpose of the information to the fullest extent permitted by law. While every effort has been made to ensure that the information provided in this article is accurate, reliable, and complete as of the time of writing, the information provided in this article should not be relied upon to make any financial, investment, real estate or legal decisions. Additionally, the information should not substitute advice from a trained professional who can take into account your personal facts and circumstances, and we accept no liability if you use the information to form decisions.
Related posts:

Weed out the problematic, errant, incompetent officers early


Wednesday, June 19, 2024

‘Review Strata Management Act’

 

Separate role for property managers


Borhan (front row, third from left) with attendees during the Strata Residential Building Management Enhancement Seminar in Shah Alam.

A REVIEW of the Strata Management Act 2013 is needed to ensure existing laws and regulations are relevant and effective, says Selangor housing and culture committee chairman Borhan Aman Shah.

He said the law needs to address emerging challenges faced by joint management bodies (JMB) and management corporations (MC).

Borhan said the Housing and Local Government Ministry should consider providing more funds and grants to JMB and MC to assist them in implementing maintenance and repair projects.

“Provide more training and capacity building for JMB and MC members as well as building management agents,” he said during the Strata Residential Building Management Enhancement Seminar at a convention centre in Shah Alam. 

Borhan said the ministry should introduce new technology for strata management.

“This includes the use of mobile apps and digital management systems to streamline the daily operations of JMB and MC in enhancing management efficiency,” he said.

He also suggested that personal accident insurance packages be included for JMB and MC committee members under the amended law to motivate them to carry out their duties.

He said for example, when the JMB or MC carried out maintenance checks and the elevator in an apartment was faulty, their safety could be at risk.

Such checks, Borhan said were made without any guarantee that they would be compensated in the event of an untoward incident.

“There is nothing to ensure their safety or welfare, and many felt burdened when carrying out their jobs.

“Besides the insurance, JMB should be allocated additional grants to enable them to carry out their responsibilities without having to worry about their safety.

Borhan advised those involved in managing apartments to attend seminars to empower and update themselves on governance system for JMB and MC.

Source link


Related

Govt to review, amend Strata Management Act

MBPG sets rescue plan for problematic strata homes - The Star

Commissioner Of Buildings (COB) In Malaysia, And Their 6 ...

Govt to review, amend Strata Management Act

KUALA LUMPUR: The government is set to review the Strata Management Act 2013 (Act 757) for amendment soon, said the local government development ministry.

Its deputy minister, Akmal Nasir, said the review and amendment of the Act were in line with the third Rolling Plan of the 12th Malaysia Plan.


Strata Management Practice & Procedure A ...

13 Oct 2021 — Strata Management Act 2013 [Act 757]. Strata Management Act 2013 [Act 757]. Strata Management (Maintenance and Management) Regulations 2015

https://www.ongmaju.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Strata-Management-Act-757-English.pdf

Related posts:





High-rise living in below par, need professionalism in managing the property


Are you overpaying your property maintenance fee?

STRATA Property insights - Serious on strata

Tuesday, October 3, 2023

EXCLUSIVE On top of the scams list: Beating the cheats

 


Ecommerce fraud cases outnumber those of investments and loans

KUALA LUMPUR: When Covid-19 struck in early 2020 and millions of people were stuck at home with nowhere to go, online shopping started picking up and not long after, so did ecommerce scams.

According to the Bukit Aman Commercial Crime Investigation Department (CCID), over RM305.94mil was lost to ecommerce scams between 2021 and August 2023.

Its director Comm Datuk Seri Ramli Mohamed Yoosuf (pic) told The Star that over the last three years, his department had observed that ecommerce scams were becoming more prevalent nationwide.

Ecommerce scams refer to fraudulent online shopping offers and tend to feature “sellers” offering bogus items either on online purchasing platforms or via social media platforms.

In most cases, the seller disappears without a trace once they receive payment from their victims.

“In terms of cases being reported, ecommerce has topped the charts since 2021 with 9,499 cases recorded that year, 9,253 cases in 2022 and 7,911 cases between January and August this year,” said Comm Ramli.

“The top three types of scams reported are ecommerce scams, bogus loans and investment scams.

“Based on our statistics, cases of ecommerce scams reported greatly outnumber the other two types.

“In the past three years, 26,663 ecommerce scam cases were reported between January 2021 and August 2023 compared with 10,759 loan scams and 9,640 investment scams reported over the same period.”

ALSO READ: Only use trusted websites, says victim

He added that while losses from ecommerce scams had been on the rise since 2021, the biggest increase was seen this year with RM144.82mil in losses recorded between January and August.

“The year has not even ended yet and already we have recorded a RM56.73mil increase in losses compared with the RM88.09mil recorded in 2022. In 2021, we recorded RM73.02mil in losses,” he said.

He added that between January and August this year, police arrested 3,659 suspects in connection with ecommerce scams.

Comm Ramli said cheating cases were becoming more challenging to curb, as technology had allowed scammers to go online.

“There is no more face-to-face between the victim and the perpetrator when it comes to online scams, which makes it tough for suspects to be identified and brought to justice.

ALSO READ: Move to beef up scam response centre

“There is room for us to improve ourselves. As online scams increase, we need to better equip ourselves with new laws that are more relevant to combat such scams,” he said, adding that he welcomed a multi-agency approach to tackle these new forms of crime.

When asked if the police were beefing up their strategies and equipment to combat scam syndicates, Comm Ramli said they were working with other agencies such as the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission as well as Bank Negara Malaysia.

“As criminals evolve, we, too, have to evolve in order to stay one step ahead of them. I will not elaborate on our strategies as it may open the door to the scam syndicates to alter their modus operandi, but rest assured that we are doing our part to fight them head to head.

“We are also part of the National Scam Response Centre (NSRC) and I must say that in terms of efficiency, it is quite effective,” he said.

He said anyone who feared that they have been scammed can contact the NSRC at 997 and action would be taken immediately.

Comm Ramli said there were some procedural matters being tweaked in order to make their efforts more proactive.

He added that their main aim was to retrieve the money for the victims.

  Source link

Beating the cheats - The Star Malaysia (2023-10-04)


There has been a 58% drop in cases of unauthorised banking transactions reported to the National Scam Response Centre in the past five months because of measures to counter scammers.

— THOMAS YONG/The star
An educational meeting: Kamarul Zaman (left) speaking to some teachers during the threat of scammers in current times town hall session at bank simpanan nasional, Johor baru. teachers are among the most common victims of online scams, which have resulted in over rm10.02mil in losses this year alone.

> Kill switch

Deactivates bank accounts and app access in the event of scams.

> Single device

Applies authentication apps to a restricted single device.

> Emergency centre

Combats scams through National Scam Response Center hotline at 997.

Special measures taken by financial institutions in recent months to counter unauthorised banking transactions commonly pulled off by scammers have borne fruit with commendable results.

Bank Negara governor Datuk Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour said the introduction of measures such as restricting authentication apps to a single device and introducing a “kill switch” for bank clients to freeze their accounts when they became accessible to hackers or scammers has resulted in a steep decline of 58% in unauthorised banking transactions reported to the National Scam Response Centre (NSRC) in the past five months.

He said the NSRC, which was launched a year ago, has received over 19,000 reports on scam cases, which led to the identification of 43,000 mule bank account holders and the freezing of more than Rm60mil.

“These early signs are very encouraging, and I trust we will see a further decline in cases as we go forward.

“As for the NSRC, I am pleased that efforts to take it to the next level are underway. Falling victim to financial fraud is undoubtedly difficult for those affected, with some victims losing their entire life savings and struggling to regain their economic footing,” said Abdul Rasheed during the launch of the 13th International Conference on Financial Crime and Terrorism Financing (IFCTF) 2023 at the Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre here.

He said dealing with financial crimes demands integrity, which is the key to preserving public confidence and trust in the financial system.

Abdul Rasheed said whether the role is in prevention, supervision or enforcement, reporting institutions, regulators, supervisors, and law enforcement agencies alike must discharge their mandate with full integrity.

“As our economy continues to grow, we must remain vigilant against evolving threats. The five high-risk crimes – corruption, fraud, drug trafficking, smuggling and organised crimes – that were identified in the National Risk Assessment (NRA) 2020 will continue to be our focus.

“However, given the evolving landscape, we have commenced a renewed risk assessment and will share our findings in the first half of 2024,” he said.

Also present at the event was Asian Institute of Chartered Bankers (AICB) chairman Tan Sri Azman Hashim.

In a briefing with the media at the event, Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) commissioner (online harms and network security committee) Derek John Fernandez said the escalation of online crimes is a worldwide trend and a result of digitalisation.

He said online criminals are emboldened as they can remain anonymous and safe from even the long arm of the law with the use of sophisticated technology, some of military grade, to penetrate their targets and escape untraced.

He said between 2018 and August 2023, the MCMC blocked 2.5 billion phone calls on suspicion of being involved in crimes.

According to him, the commission disabled 4,000 phishing sites between 2020 and August 2023.

Derek said from 2021 to August 2022, 581 million SMSES were blocked, and 237,999 mobile and fixed phone lines linked to the suspicious messages had their services terminated.

He said for the same period, 70 million peer-to-peer SMSES with suspicious hyperlinks were also prevented from reaching its intended recipients.

Derek said, on the request of the police, the commission also shut down 29 websites suspected to be involved in cheating activities.

He said 7,754 social media accounts were also flagged, with action taken for impersonation.

“This is a small fraction of the problem. In reality, it is seven times bigger because most people do not report their cases. This is the challenge faced by the MCMC,” he said.

At the same event, the Association of Banks in Malaysia (ABM) and the Association of Islamic Banking and Financial Institutions of Malaysia (AIBIM) launched their anti-scam awareness campaign, #Jangankenascam.

ABM chairman Datuk Khairusalleh Ramli said according to an industry survey on scam awareness for bank clients, nine out of 10 of them read scam alerts and were updated on the latest scam tactics, but only 60% of them felt they were prepared to counter the scams.

He said the survey also revealed that close to 80% of bank clients believe victims of scams exposed their banking credentials inadvertently to the fraudsters.

“To fight scammers, we need to learn their language. We hope that the experiential aspect of the #Jangankenascam campaign, together with the introduction of the anti-scam resource centre at www.jangankenascam.com, can provide the public with an avenue that enables them to understand the manipulation techniques used by scammers in financial scams.

“They must be alert at all times and not share their banking information with anyone,” he said.

Johor police chief Comm Datuk Kamarul Zaman Mamat wants a scam response centre set up in the state to combat scams more effectively.

“Currently, the national scam response centre is set up in the capital city and I hope that a similar centre can be set up in Johor at the state police headquarters,” he said.

“This way, those in Johor who need help can seek help directly and we will have access to the information too.

“If the operating hours are an issue, they can use the IPK (Johor police headquarters) as we are on standby 24 hours a day,” he said during the Threat of Scammers in Current Times town hall session with teachers at Bank Simpanan Nasional here yesterday.

The National Scam Response Centre collaborates with the police, Bank Negara Malaysia, the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission, the National Anti-financial Crime Centre and financial institutions.

The public can call the centre’s hotline at 997 if they fear falling victim to a scam or head to the nearest police station.

He also said that teachers are among the most common victims of online scams, which have resulted in over Rm4.24mil in losses so far this year.

He said 117 teachers reported getting scammed from January to September this year.

“Scammers usually do not target a certain group of people as they randomly pick their potential victims.

“However, Johor has a large number of teachers – more than 50,000 – so the probability of scammers preying on teachers is higher,” he said.

Teachers were part of the total of 388 scammed civil servants, involving a value of Rm10.02mil, he said.

“In terms of value, the amount recorded in the first nine months of the year was higher than the value of Rm3.41mil recorded in the same period last year.

“According to police investigations, most fraud occurred via mobile phone calls or text messages,” said Kamarul Zaman.

“This is why we are prioritising educators. We hope to engage with the public and departments, such as the Education Department, about prevention and ways of identifying scam calls,” he said, adding that about 250 teachers statewide attended the town hall session.

He also urged the public to be in tune with the news and look for the latest scam trends to avoid falling into the trap.   

 

 

Bank Negara governor Datuk Abdul Rasheed Ghaffour said the introduction of measures such as restricting authentication apps to a single device and introducing a “kill switch” for bank clients to freeze their accounts when they became accessible to hackers or scammers has resulted in a steep decline of 58% in unauthorised banking transactions reported to the National Scam Response Centre (NSRC) in the past five months.
www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2023/10/04/fewer-reporting-fraud-cases
www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2023/10/04/fewer-reporting-fraud-cases

 

 



Related stories:

 

Cut the link to spam calls

 

Only use trusted websites, says victim

'CLICK TO ENLARGE''CLICK TO ENLARGE'

Move to beef up scam response centre

Over 3,000 scam cases recorded in Johor so far, say cops

155 people nabbed in raids on scam call centres

Seized: Comm Allaudeen speaking during the press conference at the KL police headquarters. — AZMAN GHANI/The Star

KL cops nab 155, bust eight scam call centres since Sept 4