This Wednesday, President Trump became the first president in American history to be impeached twice.
Next Wednesday, Joseph Biden will be anointed President, guarded by 20,000 National Guard troops in battle gear against not foreign enemies, but domestic threats.
This was supposed to happen only in Hollywood movie scripts.
Consider these bizarre facts: the pandemic is claiming more than 4,000
deaths daily in the United States; digital media like Twitter, YouTube
and Facebook have banned tweets and comments by their own President; all
US stock market indices are still rising, and bitcoin has surged by
27.9% in 13 days.
The article of impeachment stated in more stark terms than any foreign
commentator would dare to express: “President Trump gravely endangered
the security of the United States and its institutions of government. He
threatened the integrity of the democratic system, interfered with the
peaceful transition of power, and imperiled a coequal branch of
government.
“He thereby betrayed his trust as President, to the manifest injury of
the people of the United States.Wherefore, Donald John Trump, by such
conduct, has demonstrated that he will remain a threat to national
security, democracy, and the Constitution if allowed to remain in
office, and has acted in a manner grossly incompatible with
self-governance and the rule of law.
“Donald John Trump thus warrants impeachment and trial, removal from
office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honour,
trust, or profit under the United States.”
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (pic below)summed it up as “he is a clear and present danger to the nation.”
Arguably, Trump has committed the sin of poisoning the well of democracy, not just in America, but for the rest of the world.
Although Western democrats extol its virtues back to the Greek Age, modern liberal democracy is very recent.
As late as 1978, only one third of the world lived in democracies; by 2015, more than half do. But since then, populism, Brexit and Trumpism have caused many to lament that democracy is receding.
Today, the gold standard of liberal democracy in America is being tested, if not questioned.
Work in progress
The problem is that liberal democracy based on social equality, rule of law, tolerance of diversity, is a work in progress.
Given very different cultures, history, religion and institutional set-ups, democracy is practiced differently, requiring huge efforts by all citizens.
Democracy that has no performance-accountability when what is promised is not delivered.
That became evident when the 2008 global financial crisis accentuated rising social inequality and insecurity to large segments of the population.
Democratic politics fragmented and did not seem to be able to deliver on promises.
Austrian economist and political philosopher Joseph Schumpeter became famous for his observation that the driver of capitalism was entrepreneurship, which led to creative destruction. He was equally original and sharp in his realist analysis of democracy.
In his classic Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, four conditions must be satisfied for democracy to work: the quality of politicians in terms of ability and moral character; social consensus that democracy does not solve everything; a well-trained and effective bureaucracy; and finally, “effective competition for leadership requires a large measure of tolerance for difference of opinion.”
Schumpeter understood that democracy has difficulty in making decisions when society is deeply divided.
Vote-seeking
Vote-seeking behaviour means that policies are always for the short-term, so politicians under serve the long-term interests of the nation.
For example, democratic and rich countries like Australia cannot even agree on dealing with climate change, because vested interests in the mining industry consistently block change through lobbying. If democracies cannot deliver long-term structural reforms that are painful and unpopular, then in the long-run, citizens will seek alternatives, such as autocracies or anocracies (democracy with autocratic characteristics).
Trump put American democracy in clear and present danger by violating all four Schumpeter conditions.
First, nearly half the voting population ignored his moral issues, because they believed him calling the mainstream news as “fake”.
Second, he violated many of the unspoken rules, codes and conventions that buttressed democratic checks and balances, aided by lawyers and attorney generals whom he also threw under the bus.
Third, he questioned the loyalty and efficacy of the vaunted American bureaucracy, which then failed to protect the Capitol from violent protests.
Lastly, he openly sought division, rather than work bi-partisanly to heal social divisions.
Asians have much to learn from Schumpeter, who foresaw that democracy is about majority rule, but works in practice through an elite that deals in votes rather than in money. Since capitalism by definition values money more than labour, money under financial capitalism has a nasty habit of corrupting politics.
How to control money politics from corroding diverse rights and public goods is a perennial issue in all systems of governance.
If there is one lesson that should resonate in Asia, it is that violence cannot be an answer to the democratic process.
Inciting violence
Trump realised too late that inciting violence in his supporters to protect his version of electoral victory ended up with him denouncing violence in the name of law and order.
Retribution occurs to those who incite violence abroad, because violence can bounce back at home.
Next week, the Trump Reality Show will thankfully end, and life will return to some form of normality, so we can address the threats of pandemic and job losses without being diverted by another tweet.
For Trump, impeachment will only withdraw his right to hold further public office. He was made by media, and he will be haunted by media for the rest of his life. But he will go on to earn millions from book sales and paid appearances.
The clear and present danger to democracy is a distorted system where heads I win, tails you lose.
We need to change this system, but we don’t know how to do this democratically. Perhaps Joe Biden has the answer.
By Andrew Sheng, a Distinguished Fellow of Fung Global Institute, a global think tank based in Hong Kong. The views expressed here are his own.
Trump leaves behind a bad China policy legacy
The Trump administration's China policy possesses the greatest threat to future China-US relations. It has ruined the achievements in bilateral relations the two countries had made since the establishment of diplomatic ties over four decades ago.
Trump's presidency expected to end with pardon spree as Biden era beckons
Donald Trump impeachment: A chaotic presidency doomed to end in disgrace...
Related posts:
Trump-Washington disorder drags world down, lost humanity's fight for survival against climate change
Prepared for Trump’s final madness, hysteria on China policy
Trump, with surge to over 4 million coronavirus cases, is blaming Black And Brown People for Covid-19, has 100 days to save his US presidency
Trump Is ‘Blaming Black And Brown People For Covid-19 Surge
Trump Blames ‘Fauci And These Idiots’ For His Own Coronavirus Ineptitude
After laughs at Trump, globalism or patriotism?
US-China trade war escalates, tariff list aims to hinder China’s high-tech development: expert
Huawei CFO arrest violates human rights as US takes aim at Huawei, the real trade war with China
Trapped in US-China trade war when 2 elephantine economices fight ...
Who is messing with Hong Kong?
Hong Kong's youngters barking up at the wrong tree: preaching the West's cheats, divide-and-conquer, farce hearing !
US's ‘Support Hong Kong Violence Act’ condemmed
Hong Kong youth deceived by West: ‘I go to Yale, you go to jail’ mocks agitator followers
Inside America's Meddling Machine: NED, the US-Funded Org Interfering in Elections Across the Globe
Hong Kong Riots, engineered by CIA, nothing but true!
HK security laws legislation ‘justified’
EVERY NATION ON EARTH, UNLESS A FAILED STATE HAS LAWS PTOTECTING NATIONAL SECURITY
The cost and funding of the Hong Kong violence in CIA innumerable US regime-change, a price on freedom
US playing a messy game of provocations in SCS; China build up defense to thwart the provocation
US divides China by playing risky Taiwan card with arms sales that will lead to serious consequences and puts Taiwan at risk
US profited from its weapons of deaths sales to Taiwan can be curbed? Yes and undoubtedly